Posts
Roger RootsRecently by Roger Roots: The Long Forgotten Obligation to
I recently obtained the latest edition of West’s Criminal Code and Rules, the book containing the rules you need to know if you are ever accused of a federal criminal offense. The book is updated every year, and each new edition supersedes the prior edition. It gets worse every year.
The West’s edition now runs to more than 1600 pages, with abridgments and supplements. In addition to the Rules of Criminal Procedure, the book contains selected federal criminal statutes, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States. On virtually every page are mechanisms to hurt, humiliate, control and enslave people to the government’s will – all presented within a framework of procedural rules.
Few people are aware that the Federal Rules (not just of criminal procedure but of civil procedure, appellate procedure, bankruptcy procedure and Supreme Court procedure) are riddled with provisions that grant more time to the government to file and respond to pleadings and briefs, greater privileges of appearance, and greater ease of prosecuting and defending litigation than individuals in the private sector. The governing advisory committees that produce these rules of procedure have offered no explanation for these filing requirement disparities. FULL STORY
OK, now that you have read about how the Court's Criminal Code and Court Rules are slanted in the prosecutors favor, lets listen in on a Pre Trial Conference Call between a Department of Justice Attorney and her victim. Remember, Due Process says that you have the "RIGHT" to face your accuser and have all the FACTS and FACTS OF LAW presented to a jury.
REMEMBER: Without a FACTUAL BASIS under which to use the Law, the Law cannot be used. Therefore the ONLY ISSUES that you should discuss with the IRS must be to establish FIRST (i.e., before any discussion of the Law), the FACTS related to any specific section of Law that the IRS would like to use in orderto prosecute you. If an IRS attorney cannot establish the relevent facts related to a specific law..... how can they utilize that specific law against you?
As you will hear, Marc has the ability to ask very clear questions that are designed to ESTABLISH ONLY THE FACTS. Listen to Marc in this Pretrial Conference via telephone with an IRS Attorney prior to an IRS Trial. It is a treasure trove of questions that any IRS attorney WILL NOT and CANNOT RESPOND TO.
To listen to the call, CLICK HERE
4 comments:
THIS DEMONSTRATES HOW THE INFERNAL REVENUE SERVICE USES BULLY TACTICS AND REALLY DOESN'T CARE WHAT THE LAW IS. RELYING ON THE COURT TO BE THEIR ENFORCER. SADLY MOST JUDGES COMPLY AND BOW TO THE IRS. FRIVOLOUS HAMMER (LOVED THAT). IN MY CORRESPONDENCE WITH THEM THEY OF COURSE USED THE LINE THAT, MY POSITION AND QUESTIONS WERE FRIVOLOUS TO WHICH I REPLIED "YOUR ASSUMPTION THAT MY POSITION AND QUESTIONS ARE FRIVOLOUS IS FRIVOLOUS". THEY DIDN'T LIKE THAT TOO MUCH. Sorry it is in all caps.
Thank you Rose. I have posted this info to my facebook page and credited you for the information.
Mary Mac
Thanks Rose. Marc Stevens' recording made my day.
I too, will post on facebook.
I have to tell you, that with everything we've been through, I really debated with myself about posting this Pre Trial Conference call.
These people scare me to death. I have dealt with them up close and personal in the past and know what back lash they can impose.
I believe it is more important to show the American Public just how horrific it is trying to get justice in our courts today and how dumb down the jury pool is.
We pay these people to come into our lives and take everything we have worked hard all our lives for. Common sense would tell the average person this is wrong. Unfortunately, common sense is no longer the norm.
Post a Comment