Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Oil 'could hit $200 a barrel' says investor Jim Rogers

Jim Rogers: The largest creditor nations in the world are in Asia now: China, Korea, Japan, Hong Kong. This is where the assets are. You know who the debtors are and where they are.

Economic Turmoil In 2011

Wall Street predicts blue skies. Economic recovery will continue. Stocks will deliver double-digit gains. On January 14, the Wall Street Journal's Economic Forecast Survey headlined, "Economists Optimistic on Growth," expecting in 2011:

Others disagree, including long-time insider/market analyst Bob Chapman, calling current economic policy destabilizing enough to have profound future social costs. Sometime in 2011, he says conditions are "going to be nasty. The handwriting is on the wall," but no one's listening.

Trends forecaster Gerald Celente says 2011 will be a "wake-up call (for) how grave economic conditions have become" because of ineffective, self-serving, counterproductive solutions. As a result, he sees "crack-up" ahead based on reliable indicators like unemployment, housing, currencies and sovereign debt problems, "all border(ing) between crisis and disaster." FULL STORY

Monday, January 17, 2011

Feds charge icon with "jury tampering"

If the PEPOLE ever understand their OWN POWER, the Politicians and government employees will no longer have any POWER over them to extort their Liberties.

Texans Get "IT".

Tyranny by Consent

The third sentence of our “Declaration of Independence” declares, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” The first half of that sentence (underlined) declares fundamental purpose of our government as envisioned by our Founders: to “secure” to every man, woman and even unborn child, those God-given, unalienable Rights to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The second half of the third sentence (“deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”) is less remarkable.

In fact, every governmental power, just or otherwise, is ultimately based on the “consent of the governed”. Yes, there'll always be some minority who do not consent to the powers of government, but so long as the majority consent, the minority's complaints will be ignored and the minority may even suffer oppression.

For example, when Nazi's exterminated Jews, that genocide took place with the consent of the majority of the German people. Yes, the German people might argue that they didn't know about the genocide. But, they didn't know because they didn't care to know. Their apathy manifested their tacit consent to the genocide perpetrated by their own government.
In the past, American Negroes suffered oppression by government with the “consent” of both the American majority and the oppressed Negroes, themselves. When the Negroes withdrew their consent during the Civil Rights movement, the oppression was dramatically reduced.

When Stalin executed millions of people in the former Soviet Union, he did so with the tacit consent of most of the Soviet people. As that consent was withdrawn, the Soviet Union evolved from a overt tyranny to a “kinder, gentler” government.

Ultimately, all governmental powers exist only by virtue of the “consent” of the majority of the “governed”. This is true because government understands that it's outnumbered and if the people really get angry, the government can be destroyed.

● Although a tyrannical government may hold all the guns and seemingly hold all the power, there are ways for people to withdraw their consent and thereby destroy tyrannies without violence.

For example, Mohandas Gandhi pioneered resistance to tyranny through mass civil disobedience a strategy based on noncooperation and nonviolence. Gandhi recognized that English oppression of India was ultimately based on the consent of the Indian people. Gandhi simply encouraged the Indian people to withdraw their consent, sit down, and stop working for the oppressive English. Result? England left India.

● Some oppression is driven by religion. For example, the Muslims will kill minorities that embrace alternative faiths. That kind of oppression can't be stopped by mere civil disobedience of a minority.

However, most government oppression is political and, in fact, economic. Ultimately, oppression is not about right and wrong it's about profit and loss. Oppression is ultimately about the oppressor's extortion of the wealth from the oppressed under the color of law.
Normally, oppression, tyranny, and even the seemingly less offensive “big government,” are all about the money and that's the oppressor's Achilles heel. Oppression will persist only so long as it's profitable. Remove the profit and the oppression dies. The profit for oppressors can't be generated without the consent of the oppressed. When the Indian people stopped working, India became unprofitable, so the English left.

Why? Because once a significant number of people refuse to consent to work for the oppressor, the oppressor can't afford to hire enough goons to compel the people to work. Likewise, killing the workers who won't consent is tantamount to destroying the means of production. How can an oppressive government generate more profits by killing the workers? It can't. Once the oppressed withdraw their consent to be oppressed, governmental oppression becomes unprofitable and therefore fails.

Withdrawing consent isn't easy or painless, but any people can slow down or stop working efficiently for the oppressor. As the nation becomes less efficient, less profitable, the tyranny tends to disintegrate.

● Something like that is happening here in the USA. The American people are beginning to withdraw their consent to big, oppressive government.

The most recent and dramatic evidence of this withdrawal of consent was the Tea Party movement that drove a number of incumbents out of office in last year's election.
But there are other, less dramatic, less publicized signs that the American people are withdrawing their consent to “big government” and these withdrawals may ultimately be more effective than even the Tea Party.

Small change?

A friend of mine applied for an “exemption” from paying Texas state sales tax (8.25%). Any Texan can do the same. My friend must now provide a “sales tax exempt” form to every company where he does business. He carries paperwork with him into every restaurant, grocery store and business.

I've been with him when he spent 15 minutes educating a grocery clerk and store manager to get his exemption recognized and approved. Result? He saved 50 cents in sales tax while I watched in frustration.

My friend refuses to “feed the beast” with sales tax. I, on the other hand, am too busy to fight that battle so I “feed the beast” its 8.25% and get on my way.

I don't know how many others have also begun to refuse to pay sales tax. But such people are withdrawing their consent to the oppression of big government. I, like most Texans, still consent to that oppression. So sales taxes and big government persist. For now.
But saving 8.25% on the cost of all goods and services purchased each year is equivalent to gaining one month's extra take home pay. I therefore predict that the number of Texans who withdraw their consent to sales taxes (and government oppression) will increase.

Traffic tickets

● Last March, KVUE-11 TV Austin, Texas, reported that the “Texas Driver Responsibility Act” allowed drivers convicted of certain traffic violations (especially drunk driving) to be subjected to additional fines (surcharges) imposed by the State. These additional fines could cost drivers between of $100 to $2,000 per year for as many as three years. The alleged purpose for these surcharges was to fund highways and trauma centers. Thus, the object of this oppressive legislation was money.

Today, State Rep. Sylvester Turner (who helped write the bill in A.D. 2003) admits that this law “does not work. We made a mistake.”
Why? Because at least 60% of the surcharges were never paid. 60% of those ticketed refused to consent to the additional fines.

Result? At least 1.2 million Texas driver’s licenses have been suspended for not paying/consenting to the surcharges. Most of those drivers are still driving but without a drivers license, and therefore without auto insurance. That's costing the insurance industry at least $400 million per year and dramatically complicating some automobile accident lawsuits.

● The Dallas Morning News (“DMN”) reported in “Texas' steep surcharges for driving violations clog courts, increase DWI dismissals” that this failed legislation had additional adverse consequences: clogged courts.

“A steep surcharge program for drunken driving and other driving violations is clogging state courts and causing the dismissal rate for DWI cases to skyrocket the Texas Driver Responsibility Program has had a "devastating" effect on the Texas court system, and judges across the state are reporting at least two years of pending driving-while-intoxicated cases as more defendants seek trials.”

The entire traffic ticket system relies on the public's consent to pay theirs fines by mail rather than litigate. But Texans are withdrawing their consent to pay by mail and choosing to litigate.

A good traffic cop can probably write at least $1,000 worth of tickets per hour. That's a gross of $40,000 per week per traffic cop for the local municipality. And it's almost all profit.

But if drivers withdraw their consent to pay their fines, they go to court. If they demand a real trial, the municipality can spend $10,000 or more fighting to collect a few hundred dollars in fines.

That's very bad for business. Municipalities can't run an efficient extortion racket if it costs them $10,000 to collect $200. Every court case eats up the profits from 50 tickets. If just 2% of those ticketed withdrew their consent and litigated their tickets, the profits from whole racket can disappear. If 3% contested in court, traffic tickets could cost the municipality more money than they take in.

Given that the oppressor's purpose is profit, once the traffic ticket business starts costing the municipalities money, they won't issue any more tickets. The traffic cops will leave the highways much like England left India.

Nobody has to threaten, shoot or bomb to stop traffic tickets. All that's required is for roughly 3% of those who receive traffic tickets to withdraw their consent to be fined. Without our consent, oppression becomes unprofitable and tends to perish.
Income Taxes

● Ten years ago, I saw a letter from an Assistant Commissioner of the IRS who guesstimated that there were roughly 60 million non-filers in the US. If so, about one-third of American workers, don't bother to file income tax returns.

What can the IRS do about this non-compliance? Not much. The IRS files about 1,000 criminal charges per year and generally two or three charges per defendant. That means the IRS only charges about 300-400 Americans criminally each year. If the IRS rate of criminal prosecution increased to 1000 defendants per year, it would still take 60,000 years to prosecute all current non-filers.

The income tax system can't be enforced. It can't work without the public's consent.

● On January 6th, A.D. 2011, USA Today published “IRS Tax Liens Jump by 60%, But How Effective Are They? IRS liens filed against taxpayers jumped 60% since the start of the national recession.”

Does this 60% increase mean the IRS has become 60% more aggressive or that 60% more Americans are withdrawing their consent to be taxed?

“The IRS filed more than 1 million liens in federal fiscal year 2010, the highest in nearly two decades. Lien filings can badly damage or destroy a taxpayer's creditworthiness. These liens can mean it's harder to get a job, find affordable housing or buy insurance. . . . Since the IRS pays to process the liens and file them with local county clerks, the report said it is "questionable whether liens generate much, if any, direct revenue."

Without the public's consent, the income tax laws simply don't work. If enough people simply stopped paying income taxes, the IRS would cease to exist.

For the moment, large numbers of taxpayers are withdrawing their consent to be taxed, but thanks to withholding the consent of the taxpayer is not as important as the consent of employers. So long as employers deduct taxes from their employees' checks before the employees are paid, the IRS will persist. But if employers ever withdraw their consent to withhold on behalf of the IRS, the entire income tax system will collapse.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Sheriff Arpaio warns Sheriff Dupnik he’ll fight back if he starts attacking him - Vancouver American

Appearing on the O’Reilly Factor, Arpaio reprimanded the overly opinionated and unprofessional (to say the least) sheriff of Pima County by saying that he should have been more careful and not have made his provocative comments against prominent conservatives. He also forewarned that Dupnik’s very reckless and unscrupulous comments could actually help the mass-murderer Jared Loughner, by way of his defense team using the sheriff’s comments to deflect blame away from their client. He further went on to characterize Dupnik as something of a loose cannon who just does what he wants to do, and from the slurs coming out of Dupnik’s mouth since Saturday, that characterization of him sure seems very fitting. FULL STORY

Disorderly conduct charge dropped in airport protest case

Published: January 11, 2011

Aaron B. Tobey
Aaron B. Tobey, 21, a student at the University of Cincinnati, was charged on Dec. 30 at Richmond International Airport, where he was catching a flight to attend a family funeral.

Before boarding the plane, he removed his shirt and displayed his chest, on which was written words from the Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated." FULL STORY

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Gerald Celente : Internet nuke bomb waiting to go off

Ok, Bill Maher had a lot to say about pointing a finger at anyone who is demanding that we abolish the fed and comparing them to Jared Lee Loughner. Now you may be asking, "WHY"?

So I ask you, has Bill Maher or Bill O'reily or any of the media been RIGHT? They all concede that Gerald Celente has been consistently CORRECT in his Trends Research and Predictions. Well, here's the latest. Is there anyone out there who feels that the MSM is using the Arizona Tragedy as a distraction and for political gain?

I'm posting this because so many people won't watch Fiat Empire or read the book "The Creature From JEKYLL Island. But they will watch the Simpsons on FOX.


The AMERICAN DREAM is a 30 minute animated film that shows you how you've been scammed by the most basic elements of our government system. All of us Americans strive for the American Dream, and this film shows you why your dream is getting farther and farther away. Do you know how your money is created? Or how banking works? Why did housing prices skyrocket and then plunge? Do you really know what the Federal Reserve System is and how it affects you every single day? THE AMERICAN DREAM takes an entertaining but hard hitting look at how the problems we have today are nothing new, and why leaders throughout our history have warned us and fought against the current type of financial system we have in America today. You will be challenged to investigate some very entrenched and powerful institutions in this nation, and hopefully encouraged to help get our nation back on track.

Anderson Cooper interviews Bill Maher on Arizona Tragedy.

"This is the only country in the world that shoots our leaders at the rate we do." Bill Maher

Bill Maher didn't miss a chance to take his pot shots. But lets take a look at the reality of who had influence over Jared Lee Loughner.

Bill Ayers, communist provided Arizona shooter's curriculum?
High school part of learning community funded jointly by Obama and domestic terrorist

By Aaron Klein
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

Jared Lee Loughner, the suspected gunman in Saturday's Arizona shooting, attended a high school that is part of a network in which teachers are trained and provided resources by a liberal group founded by Weatherman terrorist Bill Ayers and funded by President Obama, WND has learned.

The group, Small Schools Workshop, has been led by a former top communist activist who is an associate of Ayers. FULL STORY.

GABRIELLE GIFFORDS was not a hard core socialist Democrat. In fact, Mrs. Giffords was a very (here comes that dirty word ) very Conservative Republican turned Democrat. I guess that would explain why Mrs. Giffords could not give a satisfactory answer to someone like Jared Loughner.

But once again, we see Gerald Celente's words ringing true. The Big Broadcasters will not focus on the situation, the law is that we do not have a RIGHT to take another's life except in self-defense.

It just doesn't matter if it's a 9 year old girl, or a judge or even a congresswoman. It doesn't matter what Jared Loughner's politics or lack of politics are. What he did is against the law of the land and God's law. "Thou shalt not kill". It doesn't matter WHO Jared Loughner killed, each life is precious and no man/women has the right to end another's RIGHT to that life. ( But don't tell Bill Maher this, he believes that a woman has the right to end her un-born baby's life, even against the objection of the baby's father or Grandparents.)

To politicize this is a Dis-Honor to those who lost their lives and those who were injured. It's telling the public, "We don't really care about the people hurt, we only care about what agenda we can push because you were hurt. I think that it is disgusting how the media is using this horrible event to promote their views in politics.

When my mother heard about this, she was horrified that this very disturbed young man took so many lives. In my mother's opinion, we should not even wast the taxpayer's money having a trial. She felt that he should just be put to death or life in prison.

We don't do that in this country. We have a Due Process to follow and thank God we do. Even though the evidence against Jared Loughner is beyond a shadow of a doubt that he did in fact shoot and kill 6 people, and injure 19 others, we still need to give him his Due Process of a trial by jury. Can you even imagine the impact on this 22 year old as to what he has done.

Our youth has been so De-Sensitized by video games, movies and TV to death, but not the reality of it or the consequences.

But Celente was right about the Big Broadcasters, and so was Glenn Beck when he said that they wouldn't let a good crises go to waste. Bill Maher and Anderson Cooper prove this to be true.

"Apart from its focus, the range of Big Broadcast's coverage of all major life-shaping issues is limited to the spectrum of conventional wisdom. They can be counted on to dutifully support government positions on war, terror, crime, drugs, foreign policy, health and economic agendas. Under the pretense of "open" debate, they feature the same fraternity of predictable pundits." The Trends Journal * Winter 2010

Monday, January 10, 2011

Tucson Shooting Chaos Blame Game Begins!

When will people understand
that two wrongs do not make a right.

"The ability and proven success of self-publishing will serve as the precedent for the ability to self-broadcast. The next colossal casualty of the Internet Revolution will be the major TV/cable networks." The Trends Journal * Winter 2010

"Apart from its focus, the range of Big Broadcast's coverage of all major life-shaping issues is limited to the spectrum of conventional wisdom. They can be counted on to dutifully support government positions on war, terror, crime, drugs, foreign policy, health and economic agendas. Under the pretense of "open" debate, they feature the same fraternity of predictable pundits." The Trends Journal * Winter 2010

When you read these quotes that I took from the Winter 2010 Trends Journal, and apply them to what media is portraying over this horrible event in Tucson, it's easy to see that the Big Broadcasters have their script and once again, are ready to point fingers.

Lets take a look at who they are pointing at:

"One veteran Democratic operative, who blames overheated rhetoric for the shooting, said President Barack Obama should carefully but forcefully do what his predecessor did.

“They need to deftly pin this on the tea partiers,” said the Democrat. “Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people.”

Another Democratic strategist said the similarity is that Tucson and Oklahoma City both “take place in a climate of bitter and virulent rhetoric against the government and Democrats.”

This Democrat said that the time had come to insist that Republicans stand up when, for example, a figure such as Fox News commentator Glenn Beck says something incendiary."

"Among the many details emerging about alleged Tucson shooter Jared Loughner are his economic views, and it seems he agreed with the End-the-Fed crowd. According to the The New York Times, he told a college classmate that he was against the dollar and wanted to replace it.

In that, Loughner and Ron Paul (R-Texas) are on the same page, not that Paul has any connection to what Loughner did. But as commentators have been pointing out repeatedly since the tragic shootings, the tone of today's political rhetoric seems to appeal to some individuals who may be creeping close to the edge of sanity." DailyFinance>com

"Mr. McGahee, the algebra instructor, said that after he went to school officials to complain about Mr. Loughner, he was told by a counselor that Mr. Loughner had caused problems in other classes and had “extreme political views.”

But one classmate, Steven Cates, said he had tried on occasion to engage Mr. Loughner in political discussions, with no luck. He instead liked to talk about philosophy, or logic or literature, Mr. Cates said. He added that one topic that Mr. Loughner seemed to be obsessed with was the American dollar.

“He had talked about not liking the currency,” Mr. Cates said. “And he wished that the U.S. would change to a different currency because our currency is worthless.”

Some people who study right-wing militia groups and those who align themselves with the so-called Patriot movement said Mr. Loughner’s comments on subjects like the American currency and the Constitution, which he posted online in various video clips, were strikingly similar in language and tone to the voices of the Internet’s more paranoid, extremist corners."

"Now, of course, it's time to cue the rhetoric that always arises -- as it did with 2007's Virginia Tech shooting -- about making certain that politicians don't dare infringe on the rights of the gun industry to earn profits. An example is Ron's son, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who is quoted in Monday's Wall Street Journal saying "the weapons don't kill people; it's the individual that kills these people." My guess is that without Loughner's Glock, the six people he shot to death would probably be doing fine right now. In a tragic irony, Giffords is herself a supporter of gun ownership."

So let's see we have to blame: Ron Paul, Glenn Beck, Tea Party's, and of course, not enough Gun Control and Milia's. The media has been able to connect none of these parties to Jared Loughner, but they must somehow be to blame.

And let's not forget the references to the bombing of the Alfred P. Murra Federal Building and all the finger pointing that went on then. But what hasn't been mentioned YET was Joseph Stack III, who flew his plane into the Internal Revenue Building in Austin, Texas on February 18, 2010. Another INDIVIDUAL who was just fed up with trying to deal with Federal Employees and their unreasonable demands on him.

Try as they might, the media was not able to connect Joseph Stack III with any of the above mentioned groups because Mr. Stack left behind a document explaining his INDIVIDUAL actions.

This brings to my mind something I have heard Gerald Celente predict over and over again, "When people loose everything, they loose it."

So who should we be pointing fingers at for this HORRIBLE event? Maybe the politicians themselves should take the blame. How about government employees as well? We have far more deaths occurring in this country today by their hand than the SOLE INDIVIDUALS who, for whatever reason, loose it.

The Preamble of the Constitution states, "By the consent of the Governed". If those elected to Represent refuse to listen, than who's to blame when an individual blows up? The sad and horrific thing is that someone would even feel they had no other choice than to kill. When will people understand that two wrongs do not make a right. 


My heart goes out to those who lost a loved one in this event and to those who were injured.

Friday, January 7, 2011

The Pro Se Problem

Going to court without a lawyer is more common than you might imagine. There is a definite trend in the U.S. for more people to fight without lawyers.
An American Bar Association study is reported to show nearly 1/2 of all pro se people believe lawyers care more about their own self-interest than their client's rights.
If you go by calls and emails Jurisdictionary®  receives, there's good reason for this! Lawyers who bail at the last minute. Lawyers who don't really know what they're doing. And, worst of all, lawyers afraid to pull judges' chains and demand justice, instead of currying favor with the bench.
An estimated 60% of pro se people say they can't afford a lawyer, and 20% of pro se people say they simply don't want to spend the money.
About half of all legal actions in the U.S. involve at least one pro se party. That's a lot of good folks who need more case-winning lawsuit know-how ... since none of us were taught anything at all about justice in public school.
  1. Most pro se people don't know the rules.
  2. Most pro se people don't know how to prevent the lawyer on the other side from playing tricks with the rules.

Pro se people who know what I explain so simply in the official Jurisdictionary®  step-by-step 24-hour course are winning and even getting compliments from judges and even opposing lawyers ... because they do it right!

Public Education Is Going Down

by Gary North

Family by family, parents are making the decision to pull their children out. They want a better education for their children.

Family by family, the realization is becoming clear: a mother can stay home with her children and monitor their performance. She can give them a better education than the local tax-funded school can.

The existing educational system is desperately trying to keep the public schools from losing its best students, but it cannot win this war. Digital technology is against it. Price competition is against it. The tax revolt is against it. The looming bankruptcy of municipalities is against it. FULL STORY

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: One of the Most Evil Books in Print

by Roger Rootsby
 Roger RootsRecently by Roger Roots: The Long Forgotten Obligation to 

I recently obtained the latest edition of West’s Criminal Code and Rules, the book containing the rules you need to know if you are ever accused of a federal criminal offense. The book is updated every year, and each new edition supersedes the prior edition. It gets worse every year.

The West’s edition now runs to more than 1600 pages, with abridgments and supplements. In addition to the Rules of Criminal Procedure, the book contains selected federal criminal statutes, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States. On virtually every page are mechanisms to hurt, humiliate, control and enslave people to the government’s will – all presented within a framework of procedural rules.

Few people are aware that the 
Federal Rules (not just of criminal procedure but of civil procedure, appellate procedure, bankruptcy procedure and Supreme Court procedure) are riddled with provisions that grant more time to the government to file and respond to pleadings and briefs, greater privileges of appearance, and greater ease of prosecuting and defending litigation than individuals in the private sector. The governing advisory committees that produce these rules of procedure have offered no explanation for these filing requirement disparities.   FULL STORY

OK, now that you have read about how the Court's Criminal Code and Court Rules are slanted in the prosecutors favor, lets listen in on a Pre Trial Conference Call between a Department of Justice Attorney and her victim. Remember, Due Process says that you have the "RIGHT" to face your accuser and have all the FACTS and FACTS OF LAW presented to a jury.

REMEMBER: Without a FACTUAL BASIS under which to use the Law, the Law cannot be used.  Therefore the ONLY ISSUES that you should discuss with the IRS must be to establish FIRST (i.e., before any discussion of the Law), the FACTS related to any specific section of Law that the IRS would like to use in orderto prosecute you.  If an IRS attorney cannot establish the relevent facts related to a specific law..... how can they utilize that specific law against you?

As you will hear, Marc has the ability to ask very clear questions that are designed to ESTABLISH ONLY THE FACTS.  Listen to Marc in this Pretrial Conference via telephone with an IRS Attorney prior to an IRS Trial.  It is a treasure trove of questions that any IRS attorney WILL NOT and CANNOT RESPOND TO.

To listen to the call, CLICK HERE

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Revisiting American History - Financial Empire

Dear Concerned Citizen:

Have you ever wondered how the international bond market effects you? Watch these short, very clear, lessons on how the world financial system works, and you will know.

The lessons are given by a United State Military Academy grad who served as an officer in the U.S. Army, then went to Harvard Business School and later worked on Wall Street and in Silicon Valley.

I will assure you, you did not learn this material in school or college, nor will you get this information from the mainstream media.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Forecaster Gerald Celente: Predictions for 2011.

American trends forecaster Gerald Celente of the Trends Research Institute makes predictions for 2011. Celente has appeared on many different TV shows in the U.S.

Celente argues that the economy will become much worse during the year. There will be loss of liberty and crackdown on the people as the war on terror and on crime expands. In the name of terror the government will clamp down on the people. Celente says:"Big Brother will be watching!" "We even have Wal-Marts as a rat for the homeland security division to call them up and let them know if anything is untoward that they should know about and they are talking now about expanding homeland terrorist security in hotels and shopping malls."

The government will hit people with increased costs in every area to help pay for deficits. The people rather than the big financial corporations will bear the pain of paying off the debt.

Celente sees gold prices as moving much higher as more money is pumped into the system by the federal reserve. He sees gold as reaching two thousand an ounce or more.

There will be increased cyber warfare in 2011. It will be a new type of warfare for the 21st century. The trend was obviously already on the march in 2010 with attacks on Iran's nuclear agency, on Wikileaks, and several revenge attacks on companies such as Paypal. All in all Celente's predictions are for trends that are mostly bad for 2011. I include a video discussing his main predictions on RT.

$10 Oil? Mike Maloney Schools Bankers on Deflation, Gold and Silver