Extraordinary Rejection of Basic Constitutional Rights by 7th Circuit Appeals Court

Rejection of a hearing "en banc" (full panel) by the 7th Circuit would appear to mean that this Court does not recognize Mr. Benson's right to prove - with evidence comprised of public documents - his research which has shown that the 16th Amendment was not properly ratified. At stake is Benson's right to continue disseminating his research under publication entitled "The Law That Never Was," together with exposure to additional criminal prosecution.

You'll want to listen to Atty Dickstein's oral argument before the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (likely, more than once) and decide for yourself how URGENT it is that the Benson case is heard before the Supreme Court.

Determine for yourself how URGENT it is for you to pass this along to your networks.